Back to the Future:  U.S. Airways v. McCutchen

Back to the Future: U.S. Airways v. McCutchen

April 24, 2013

On April 16, 2013, the United States Supreme Court clarified how equitable principles interact with the plan language of self-funded ERISA health plans.  The question presented to the Court was: Should the principles of “common fund,” often referred to as a reduction for attorney fees, and “made whole,” the principle requiring full compensation to the injured party before subrogating parties are allowed to recover, overcome express plan language abrogating those principles? Sadly, the Court has ruled that they should not.

Read Post
Vioxx Settlement Recipients May Be On Their Own For ERISA Lien Resolution

Vioxx Settlement Recipients May Be On Their Own For ERISA Lien Resolution

April 9, 2013

Families and individuals injured by Vioxx may still have lien claims to resolve despite the Lien Resolution Administrator’s attempt to manage these claims.  In a December 4, 2012 ruling the United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana denied the motion of approximately forty six (46) insurance companies to have their lien claims resolved from the Vioxx settlement fund.

Read Post
ERISA: Put New Teeth Into Plan Document Requests with 1024(b)(4)

ERISA: Put New Teeth Into Plan Document Requests with 1024(b)(4)

October 22, 2012

One of the keys to properly defending against an asserted subrogation or reimbursement claim from an ERISA plan is making requests to the plan administrator. One of the major responsibilities of the plan administrator, as to dealing with the providing of information to beneficiaries, is contained in 29 U.S.C. 1024(b)(4).

Read Post