Patrick Malone firm sues Trump on behalf of injured police officers in January 6 US Capitol riot.
December 1st, 2023: Court of Appeals rules that Capitol Police officers suit against Trump can go ahead
The decision on December 1, 2023 rejected Trump’s claim that he was acting officially as President, and was thus immune from lawsuit, when he urged his supporters to march on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
And our law firm’s statement in response:
Today’s decision makes clear that our constitutional order does not grant former President Donald J. Trump with immunity for his attempt to subvert our democracy. It should be obvious, but is worth reiterating: Our founders didn’t overthrow a tyrant king just to allow another to take his place.
On January 6, 2021, a violent mob staged an attack on the United States Congress, intending to prevent a peaceful transfer of presidential power. Then-President Trump and his allies rallied this mob of thousands of supporters behind the repeatedly debunked lie that the 2020 presidential election was stolen and summoned them to Washington. Trump then incited those supporters
to storm the U.S. Capitol, where Congress was counting Electoral College votes.
U.S. Capitol Police Officers James Blassingame Jr. and Sidney Hemby were on duty protecting the Capitol on January 6. Both endured hours of threats and violent attacks and suffered significant injuries as a result.
“More than two years later, it is unnerving to hear the same fabrications and dangerous rhetoric that put my life as well as the lives of my fellow officers in danger on January 6, 2021,” said James Blassingame, one of two plaintiffs in this case. He continued, “I couldn’t be more committed to pursuing accountability on this matter. I hope our case will assist with helping put our democracy back on the right track; making it crystal clear that no person, regardless of title or position of stature, is above the rule of law.”
“Today’s ruling makes clear that those who endanger our democracy and the lives of those sworn to defend it will be held to account,” said lead counsel Patrick Malone, of Patrick Malone & Associates. “Our clients look forward to pursuing their claims in court.”
“We’re moving one step closer to justice, one step closer to accountability, and one step closer to healing some of the wounds suffered by James Blassingame and Sidney Hemby,” said Kristy Parker, counsel at Protect Democracy. “As this case shows, our constitutional order does not grant former President Donald J. Trump with immunity for his attempt to subvert our democracy.”
Update 9/23/2023: Police Officers file their brief in U.S. Court of Appeals opposing Trump’s immunity bid.
On September 23, 2022, Officers Blassingame and Hemby, through their attorneys at the Patrick Malone law firm and the nonprofit Protect Democracy, filed their brief in the U. S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. The legal filing explains in detail why the appeals court should reject Trump’s bid to avoid accountability for the January 6 insurrection. Trump has appealed the district court’s rejection of his motion to dismiss the lawsuit. Trump contends that as president, he should have “absolute immunity” from this lawsuit arising from injuries suffered by the police officers defending the Capitol in the January 6 riot. The officers’ brief was filed jointly with two groups of members of Congress who have also sued Trump for their injuries on January 6.
1965949-Brief-of-Appellees explains why the Constitution gives no immunity from civil lawsuit to a President who used an angry mob to physically attack a coequal branch of government, Congress, while Congress was exercising a function exclusively assigned to it by the Constitution, the counting of the Electoral College votes from the 2020 election.
As the plaintiffs wrote in their brief: “There is simply no constitutional basis for Trump’s immunity claim. It is inconceivable that he was carrying out any function of the presidency when he directed his supporters to use violence and intimidation to halt the constitutionally prescribed process for counting Electoral College votes. To the contrary, he was doing the very opposite of what our Constitution, and our nation’s two-hundred year history of peaceful transfers of power, demand of a sitting president.”
Trump has one more brief to file in the appeals court, and then the court is likely to hold an oral argument late this year or early next year.